RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Throughout history, society has dealt with several devastating pandemics. Our objective is to analyze society's coping mechanisms to deal with pandemic-related stress in history congruent with the values of the time. For that purpose, we have carefully selected some of the most significant pandemics based on their impact and the available psychosocial literature. After a brief introduction, society's coping tools are reviewed and analyzed for the Antonine Plague, the second bubonic plague, the third cholera pandemic, the Spanish flu, the HIV pandemic, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite occurring at different times in history, parallels can be established in the study of society's psychological reactions among different pandemics. Magical thinking, political skepticism, fake accusations, and discrimination of minorities are recurrent reactions in society among different pandemics in history.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: People with serious mental illness are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 but face barriers to vaccinations. The authors describe the implementation of a mobile vaccine clinic at an outpatient mental health clinic for patients and health care workers to increase vaccination rates. METHODS: In late 2021, mobile vaccine clinics were held in collaboration with a local pharmacy to provide COVID-19 and influenza vaccines to patients and health care workers. Participants in one clinic were asked to fill out a questionnaire about their experience. RESULTS: Of 69 individuals who completed the questionnaire, 96% received the COVID-19 booster and 17% received the seasonal flu vaccine. Most patients and health care workers reported that the mobile vaccine clinic was easily accessible and preferable and that they would recommend it. Moreover, the mobile vaccine clinic was cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile vaccine clinics can improve vaccine access for patients and health care workers in community mental health settings and can be cost-effective.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This pilot project aimed to maximize COVID-19 vaccine uptake among patients with serious mental illness. Psychiatric providers were engaged to directly address COVID-19 vaccine-related concerns with patients during outpatient visits. METHODS: A quality improvement project encouraged COVID-19 vaccinations in a cohort of outpatients treated with clozapine (N=193, ages 19-81 years, mean age=46.4 years) at a community mental health center. In-service education was provided to clinicians to identify vaccine-hesitant patients and build vaccine confidence. A vaccination-monitoring tool was created and embedded in patients' electronic medical records. Starting in February 2021, the tool guided semistructured interviews at each visit and supported population-based management. RESULTS: The full COVID-19 vaccination rate by June 30, 2021, was 84% among the outpatients, compared with the estimated state rate on the same date of between 62.1% and 77.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The active involvement of psychiatric providers in preventive health care can help increase vaccination rates among patients with serious mental illness.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proyectos Piloto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapiaAsunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones Febriles/inducido químicamente , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Factores de Edad , Antipiréticos/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Convulsiones Febriles/diagnóstico , Convulsiones Febriles/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , VacunaciónAsunto(s)
Clozapina , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/envenenamiento , Clozapina/envenenamiento , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Delirio/inducido químicamente , Ileus/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Betacoronavirus , Trastorno Bipolar/complicaciones , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19 , Catatonia/complicaciones , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Esquizofrenia/complicacionesRESUMEN
Public and community psychiatrists who care for patients with serious mental illnesses regularly face ethical challenges. This article summarizes key ethical considerations in the care of a population that can be difficult to engage and may reject treatment, sometimes necessitating coercive care. The digital revolution in medicine, with its promises and perils and accelerated by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has added ethical complexity regarding privacy and access to care. Shared decision-making, a process to resolve ethical dilemmas, and commitments to professionalism and reflective practice are emphasized as three ways to practice ethically in public and community psychiatrists' daily work. Additionally, COVID-19 has highlighted that engagement in social justice is a critical element of ethical practice for physicians today. [Psychiatr Ann. 2021;51(6):272–277.]
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , COVID-19 , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevención Secundaria , Adulto , Boston , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/métodos , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Innovación Organizacional , SARS-CoV-2 , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Prevención Secundaria/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
People with serious mental illness are at disproportionate risk of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality because of high rates of risk factors that directly parallel those related to poor coronavirus outcomes, including smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes, along with housing instability, homelessness, food insecurity, and poverty. Community-based behavioral health organizations are also at risk of adverse outcomes because of dramatic declines in revenues and a diminished workforce. The State of Massachusetts has responded to this crisis by rapidly implementing a variety of policy, regulatory, and payment reforms. This column describes some of these reforms, which are designed to enhance remote telehealth delivery of care, ensure access to needed medications and residential care staff, and support the financial livelihood of community-based behavioral health services.